Grievance counsel confirms the resubmitted attachments were received, accessible, and added to the file.
Grievance counsel confirms receipt of supplemental materials in the reconsideration; one attachment could not be opened.
The ADA Coordinator says a submission reached him only as a courtesy copy and directs the complainant to confirm receipt directly with grievance counsel.
An unsigned message from an Office mailbox confirms three grievances, limits the complainant to a single withdraw/supplement channel, and attributes an email-address question to a possible AI-generated search result.
An audit of the Bar’s website: one of twenty WCAG criteria met, focus indicators suppressed on 97 percent of elements, and no accessibility statement.
After litigation is mentioned, the Office states it will not engage in further substantive correspondence except through counsel, while reserving all rights.
The Office approves postponing the reconsideration decision until June 15, 2026, to allow time after hand surgery to submit additional materials.
A short scheduling exchange: an 11:30 meeting is offered, then withdrawn as sent in error, with requests for more time to review the complainant’s correspondence.
The Deputy General Counsel states the State Bar is not a public entity, is not required to publish an ADA Coordinator, and suggests the disability-access request is aimed at a substantive outcome.
A numbered ledger of specific questions and demands on grievance procedure, accommodation, conflict screening, and file handling, attached to the cure letter.
