What three other state bars publish for disabled complainants, and what Georgia does not.
The Bar publishes 113 employees across 23 departments, more than double the threshold that triggers a published ADA coordinator and grievance procedure.
The Bar’s only published ADA contact appears on the Spanish-language grievance form. The English form contains none.
The only online route to file a grievance requires a CAPTCHA. For someone with bilateral hand dysfunction relying on assistive technology, that can be a hard wall.
The Bar publishes how to request accommodations for its Annual Meeting. For the grievance process a disabled complainant must use, it publishes no equivalent.
The State Bar publishes a full staff directory with a department for nearly everything. It does not list an ADA Coordinator.
The Office restates it is not subject to Title II, suggests any obligation arises under Title III, declines ‘litigation-oriented’ correspondence, and routes legal questions to the Deputy General Counsel.
The ADA Coordinator sorts the complainant’s consolidated question ledger and routes most questions back to the Deputy General Counsel.
The ADA Coordinator notes the complaint about the lack of a non-CAPTCHA route to the grievance form and the differences between the Spanish and English forms.
A consolidated list of outstanding questions about status, procedure, accommodation, and routing. The Bar answered a minority and declared the rest would not be processed.
