A formal letter asked the General Counsel to cure documented Title II defects within a stated window. No cure issued.
The ADA Coordinator responds point-by-point to the complainant’s listed access concerns and offers to limit communications to two contacts.
The Office answers five operational questions about how grievances are routed, screened by alphabetical assignment of the respondent’s surname, and how evidence is filed.
The Office grants written-only communication and accessible-format accommodations, offers to postpone review until after surgery, and routes procedural questions to grievance counsel.
A Senior Assistant General Counsel identifies himself as ADA Coordinator for the reconsideration and states the Office does not need further participation from the complainant at this stage.
The Office admits in writing that the complainant’s February rebuttal materials were received but misclassified and left out of the file before the grievance was dismissed.
A one-page letter, signed by a Deputy General Counsel, dismissed the grievance and stated no rebuttal was received. The Bar’s own intake had confirmed the rebuttal arrived.
