State Bar of Georgia · ADA Access Diary · Day 7 of 25
I sent two letters: a full response to Shiptenko's May 4 and May 7 emails, and a final institutional cure-demand to the General Counsel, both setting a single cure deadline.
What had to be true
For a "cure" demand to make sense, an uncured defect had to remain: the April 10 dismissal had to still be operative despite the admitted misclassification.
What I argued
- Requested a single coordinated written response "by May 14, 2026, 17:00 ET" so there is "one shared record going forward."
- Asked the Bar to state the procedural status of the April 10 dismissal and whether it "may fairly be described as a complete-record merits determination."
- Restated the load-bearing admission and asked the Bar "to correct the procedural record internally before the cure window closes."
What the Bar said
None on this date.
What it cost
I had to consolidate the entire matter into a formal cure demand and demand-ledger exhibit, the work of forcing a single institutional answer because I had been unable to obtain one across multiple scattered exchanges.
The documents from this day
- I responded to the Bar’s May 7 email to its General Counsel
- I gave the Bar a final notice before the cure window closed
Read the full story on the State Bar page. See the record in the document room.