We Are Not Alone: What Others Say About the State Bar of Georgia, Part 5

Full review as posted

Don't waste your time here. I filed a grievance about the deliberate misrepresentation of the law and they said I did not prove misconduct. Having attended law school myself I will like to inform the public on what that means. It means that they did not pull the law to compare it to what was dictated by said lawyer nor did they look at the case itself to read the public documents I filed. Instead, they spoke to the lawyer about it and made an under-the-table agreement and then and only then made a written decision of total BS. This was so obvious that I'm looking into the Bar itself for code of conduct violations. Their 'good standing' criteria is only about the payment of dues and NOT the caliber of the members. So crooks can say they are legit and once they pay their dues on time they are presented to the public as legit. The person I spoke to said they 'investigate' ALL members but what was obvious to me is he never considered it may be one of their own on the take. When they stated in regard to my complaint that the evidence was insufficient proof of misconduct and then added they do not make legal decisions I almost passed out laughing. Then I got angry since they obviously thought I must be inferior with such a lame statement of their obvious disdain for the public they are supposed to serve. It seems to me the determination of sufficient evidence is in itself a legal decision. It's also clear they were lying because the evidence cannot be insufficient if the evidence is THE STATUTE ITSELF. I'm a transplant to GA but will look into the possibility of litigating against the bar directly because they also did not know that bar numbers are not duplicated. That means the State Bar of GA can be held complicit in the increasing numbers of FAKE lawyers in this state as they do not know how to spot a fake. That is some scary sh*t!
The result of a grievance so simple maker me not want any lawyer listed by the Bar. You have to be inept to not make a single reference about the law itself that was the entire basis of the grievance filed. It was shocking to see the misconduct of the organization investigating the misconduct of one of their own. If a lawyer is a member by coincidence fine, but I will not look here to find one as it became clear that the intent is to preserve the local laws on default judgments and ignore the universal law that gives ALL citizens of Gwinnett County the right to appeal a default illegally obtained or 'fixed' So, I'll do what they refused to endorse

PLEASE NOTE THAT IF A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST YOU AS A DEFENDANT, UNDER UNIVERSAL LAW, IT IS A MATTER OF RIGHT, THAT YOU CAN APPEAL. IF LIKE ME THEY SEND A DOCUMENT STATING YOU CANNOT IT IS A LIE!!! ONLY IN MINORITY MAJORITY COUNTIES; DEKALB, FULTON, GWINNETT etc do they replace Universal law and substitute local law to deceive the public and maintain SYSTEMATIC RACISM. I have the proof in the order so they cannot refute it and have already escalated this racist response to the ABA along with the fact that they have stated that ALL are entitled to appeals on the small claims court website. They also had a copy of my case and saw there were motions unanswered BEFORE TRIAL AND an ANSWER. No evidence of misconduct??? So, STATE BAR OF GA, CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW????

Georgia Code
TITLE 9 – CIVIL PRACTICE
CHAPTER 11 – CIVIL PRACTICE ACT
ARTICLE 7 – JUDGMENT
§ 9-11-55 – Default judgment
O.C.G.A. 9-11-55 (2010)
9-11-55. Default judgment

(a) When case in default; opening as matter of right; judgment. If in any case an answer has not been filed within the time required by this chapter, the case shall automatically become in default unless the time for filing the answer has been extended as provided by law. The default may be opened as a matter of right by the filing of such defenses within 15 days of the day of default, upon the payment of costs.

STATE BAR OF GA SAYS THE ATTORNEY DID NOTHING WRONG – FROM GWINNETT COUNTY WEBSITE
Civil Default Judgment
Pursuant to Uniform Magistrate Court Rule 43.1, a Plaintiff must comply with the following provisions before seeking entry of a Default Judgment in any Civil Action.
You (the Plaintiff) must certify to the following:
The date, time, and type of service perfected on your Claim to the Defendant;
That proof of service on the Defendant was filed with the Court;
The date of proof of service on the Defendant was filed with the Court; and
That no defensive pleadings (example – answer) have been filed by the Defendant as shown by Court records.

Full review as posted

The Georgia State Bar and Justices of the Georgia Supreme Court Colluded & Conspired to Illegally Disbar & Denied Me of Mandatory Right to a Jury Trial Atlanta Georgia

Georgia State Bar and Georgia Supreme Court Justices William J. Cobb (Bar Counsel for Georgia State Bar), Paula Frederick (General Counsel for Georgia State Bar) — Carol Hunstein, David Nahimias, Harold Melton, Keith Blackwell, Robert Benham, Nels SD Peterson, Britt Grant and Michael Boggs (Past and/or Present Justices of the Georgia Supreme Court)

The Georgia Supreme Court, consisting of past or current Justices, including Carol Hunstein, David Nahimias, Harold Melton, Keith Blackwell, Robert Benham, Nels SD Peterson, Britt Grant and Michael Boggs, & the Georgia State Bar, have continued to collude & conspire to carry out an illegal, criminal & unethical scheme to wrongfully disbar attorneys such as myself by fraudulently "defaulting" them on the pleadings for not timely responding to their discovery or (which is not possible) in order to deny the accused attorney of a jury trial (which is mandatory under O.C.G.A. 15-19-32) & other due process, equal protection, privileges & immunities related constitutional rights.

In my case, some of the main key players from the State Bar of Georgia include Bar Counsel William Cobb, General Counsel Paula Frederick & Patrick Head (Special Master). My fraudulent disbarment as a matter of fact (not opinion) contain dozens of false statements & material omissions. This & other related fraudulent disbarment schemes goes back to at least the late 80's when the GA State Bar & GA Supreme Court even in 1989 or so, went so far as to forge another attorney Robert Hudnall's name on a petition for voluntary disbarment b/c he would not screw his black client out of their land which was demanded by Judge John Henry Land (see Hudnall's book – "Why Would They Say It If It Wasn't True").

These are very dangerous, unethical, corrupt & rogue public officials, so be wary and know that they will "blow off" conflict of interest & other judicial rules of conduct to do & accomplish what they want, which is typically politically motivated. The GA State Bar & the GA Supreme Court also spend a disproportionate amount of time coming up with ways, schemes & methods to limit, reduce or even eliminate their civil, criminal & ethical liability for their acts of malfeasance and misfeasance.

Bottom line – the GA State Bar & GA Supreme Court are illegally taking away attorneys' law licenses. What kind of a person or institution does that? What does this say about their character? These are the people passing judgments on the scruples, integrity & character of attorneys & prospective attorneys? If I could give these corrupt public officials negative 5 stars I would, that is how bad they are.