Who they are
Adrienne D. Nash is Grievance Counsel in the State Bar of Georgia Office of the General Counsel. She was assigned to handle the reconsideration. The State Bar lists her as Assistant General Counsel in its staff directory.
Why they are on this page
Facts only. What they did or did not do, each with a document behind it.
- She was named the reconsideration handler on May 4, 2026 but did not respond to the complainant from May 4 through May 20.
- She replied for the first time on May 21, after three written requests, and confirmed receipt on May 22.
- On June 30, 2026 she signed the reconsideration affirmance that left the April 10 dismissal in place.
Timeline
Every email they sent, were sent, or were copied on, in order, each linked to the item. Where a read receipt was captured, the time is shown. Chronology, not motive.
| Date | Role | What it was | Read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | Designated | Named in writing as the reconsideration handler. No response for over two weeks. | Read it |
| May 18, 2026 | Sent to her | The supplemental-evidence submission. No read receipt captured. No response. | Read it |
| May 19-20, 2026 | Sent to her | Two more requests to confirm receipt. No response until a third request. | Read it |
| May 21, 2026 | She sent | Her first reply, confirming receipt and flagging one attachment as inaccessible. | Read it |
| May 22, 2026 | She sent | Confirmation that the resent attachments were accessible and would be added to the file. | Read it |
| June 30, 2026 | She signed | The reconsideration affirmance leaving the April 10 dismissal in place. | Read it |
The complaint we filed
Ms. Nash is on this record as the signer of the June 30 reconsideration. The conduct at issue is the reconsideration itself: it affirmed a dismissal the Bar admitted was issued on a misfiled record, without correcting that record. The reconsideration determination is part of the June 30 dispositions. Read the June 30 dispositions.
Their clearance
Ms. Nash was not herself the subject of a grievance dismissed on June 30. She signed the June 30 reconsideration that affirmed the original dismissal. Read the June 30 dispositions.
The effect is the same as a screening dismissal one level up: the record the Bar admitted was wrong was left standing, and the reconsideration did not correct it.